Amid NYT Legal Troubles, OpenAI Investigates Content Licensing Agreements With Publishers

Published on:

Last Updated on January 5, 2024 by Bitfinsider

It is said that OpenAI is starting to negotiate with a number of publishers in order to obtain license agreements for their works of material. The company wants to improve its models of artificial intelligence. Positive conversations are still running strong, according to OpenAI’s Chief of Intellectual Property and Content, Tom Rubin.

As per reports, Rubin declared, “We are in the middle of many negotiations and discussions with many publishers. They are active. They are very positive. They’re progressing well. You’ve seen deals announced, and there will be more in the future.”

Furthermore, the recent multimillion-dollar contracts with The Associated Press and Axel Springer SE have been crucial in meeting OpenAI’s data needs. But a big obstacle appeared when The New York Times filed a lawsuit against Microsoft Corp. and OpenAI, claiming that the companies had used its pieces without authorization.

OpenAI faces two threats as a result of the New York Times lawsuit. Damages worth billions of dollars could arise from it. Furthermore, if the NYT wins the case, it raises the prospect of having to delete training data that contains Times material. In addition, this legal dispute complicates OpenAI’s current talks with the media sector and raises concerns about the direction of its content acquisition plan.

Rubin, however, backed OpenAI’s strategy in spite of the legal turbulence. He stressed that the group is approaching the current predicament in a different way than it approached publishers’ previous problems with search engines and social media.

Rubin clarified, saying, “In this instance, the content is used for training a model.” The content is not replicated using it. It doesn’t take the place of the content. The New York Times, however, stood by their assertion. It claimed that OpenAI’s language model ChatGPT replicates the work of its journalists for free.

The Times also demanded that it be legally mandatory to get consent before using any of its content for profit. The company said in the lawsuit that Microsoft and OpenAI must first get our consent in order to use our work for commercial gain. They have not fulfilled this obligation.


Hardware wallets are safe and secure devices that can be used offline. They keep your cryptocurrency offline, making it impossible for you to be hacked. To find out more on the leading hardware wallets, you may view our reviews here: Ledger & Trezor
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by the author, or any people mentioned in this article, are for informational purposes only, and they do not constitute financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice. Investing in or trading cryptocurrency or stocks comes with a risk of financial loss.

Related